Lavkesh Kumar Singh

A well made movie from a habitual propaganda peddler. The format is that of art cinema, and Kapil Sharma has acted out of his skin in this heartwarming tale from the bottom of the pyramid POV The good: the making. It doesn’t really tell you a remarkable story. It doesn’t develop an extraordinary character. Zwigato’s victory is capturing the environment accurately without being cinematic The Bad: a flawed ideology masqueraded as artwork.though the grip of brainwashed communists while loosening on the mainstream discourse does have repercussions, it continues to sprout its malignant shoots on this format. The narrative portrays the huge corporate as evil, and the cause of all problems in the life of someone who gains employment though it. Are there challenges? Yes. But what are the repercussions of closing these down? The ideology that this kind of cinema backs has no answers expect a fake promise of a lalaland, which plunges societies in poverty and in the hands of ruthless monarchs wherever it succeeds. The Ugly: Who’s the bad guy? Yes, the delivery company employing the poor people. Also the vagabonds who have to have a very clear ‘tilak’ on their foreheads while trying to gather pleasure through the death of someone who was a manual labourer who took a drastic step. What’s the motive of this narrative? Just toooooo obvious. Cumon Nandita! The funding which gets you to make this propaganda movie is capitalistic in nature. And yes, this will peddle your agenda well, but a closing of one Zomato will have repercussions on the lives of hundreds of thousands people- something that neither your abbarated vision nor your skewed sense of social justice is willing to envision