pooja bhardwaj

The Archies: A Missed Opportunity for Nostalgia and Authenticity The Archies, directed by Zoya Akhtar, attempts to translate the beloved comic book characters into a 1960s India setting. While the film boasts vibrant visuals and catchy music, it ultimately falls short due to its reliance on nepotism and the resulting lack of genuine talent. The most noticeable issue lies in the casting. Suhana Khan, despite displaying visible effort, struggles to deliver a convincing performance. Her acting appears forced and overly polished, failing to capture the essence of the character she portrays. This feeling extends to other cast members, chosen based on family connections rather than acting ability. Their performances lack depth and naturalism, hindering the film's emotional resonance. Suhana is a kid of one of the most amazing actor in the world and she has very big shoes to fill. She will be always and forever compared to her father for every single performance. It is heartbreaking to see her go through life where her father cannot help her escape the terrible acting with his money like his son got away with drugs allegations. I’d like to point out that Suhana khan is trying extremely hard to be perfect and it is reflecting in her acting. She is unbearable to watch. Her dance moves also seem way too much. Her over acting is being portrayed in her dance, the way she walks, the way she speaks. God save her from the trolls after this. Furthermore, the script fails to capture the true spirit of the Archie comics. The narrative feels superficial, lacking the depth and humor that endeared the characters to generations of readers. The attempt to infuse social commentary into the story feels forced and ultimately detracts from the overall experience. It feels like the director was paid by the nepo kids parents to cast them in anything in order to launch them even though they are horrible in their performances. While the film boasts aesthetically pleasing visuals and a vibrant soundtrack, these elements fail to compensate for the shortcomings in the acting and narrative. The Archies ultimately feels like a missed opportunity to deliver a nostalgic and authentic adaptation of a beloved classic. Positives: 1. Visually appealing with vibrant colors and period-specific costumes. 2. Catchy music that captures the spirit of the 1960s. Negatives: 1. Unconvincing performances from the cast, especially Suhana Khan. 2. Lack of depth and authenticity in the narrative. 3. Reliance on nepotism over genuine talent. Overall: The Archies is a visually and aurally pleasing film, but it ultimately fails to deliver a satisfying experience due to its reliance on nepotism and the resulting lack of genuine talent. It serves as a reminder that nostalgia and visual aesthetics are not enough to carry a film without a strong narrative and convincing performances. Now, Alia Bhatt is an amazing actor but we all remember how pathetic she was in student of the year and I can honestly say, had she been in Suhana’s shoes, she would have given a marvellous performance.

"Animal": A Dangerous Glorification of Toxicity Animal, disguised as a stylish action thriller, is ultimately a deeply problematic film that glorifies toxic masculinity and normalizes harmful behaviors. While the film boasts slick visuals and Ranbir Kapoor's intense performance, it fails to offer any meaningful commentary or introspection on the destructive nature of its protagonist. Instead, the film indulges in a disturbing celebration of violence, misogyny, and emotional manipulation. The story revolves around a deeply flawed male character whose anger and aggression are not only excused but also romanticized. The film actively downplays the consequences of his actions, leaving viewers with a disturbing sense of normalization for toxic relationships and harmful behavior. The Impact on Young Generations: The film's most alarming aspect is its potential impact on young audiences. The glorification of violence and toxic masculinity can easily be misconstrued as desirable traits, especially for young viewers who are still forming their own identities. The lack of critical commentary on the protagonist's actions sends the dangerous message that such behavior is acceptable, even admirable. Beyond Male Perspective: The film's narrow focus on the male perspective further exacerbates its problems. Female characters are relegated to one-dimensional roles, existing solely to serve the narrative of the male protagonist. This lack of representation and the film's overall dismissiveness of female perspectives contribute to the harmful portrayal of gender dynamics. A Moral Fail: Animal fails not only as a film but also as a piece of social commentary. By failing to offer any meaningful criticism of its protagonist's actions, the film normalizes toxic behavior and becomes complicit in perpetuating harmful societal norms. In a world grappling with issues of violence and inequality, Animal is a dangerous step backwards, glorifying the very traits that we should be fighting against. A Call to Action: It is crucial for viewers to critically analyze films like Animal and recognize the dangers they pose. We must encourage responsible storytelling that promotes positive values and challenges harmful stereotypes. By raising awareness and demanding better representation, we can ensure that future generations are not exposed to the toxic messages that films like Animal promote.