Anjali

I wonder the same type of role is being played by the protagonist. Zara hatke, Rajwade and now this. Always gloomy, sad, in dilemma. Then at the end there is a ray of hope. Why? Can’t they portray a role which already has a clarity? Offscreen image would be of a smart actress and why such portrayals are offered to the audience? Or you want the audience to be like that- confused between own beliefs of happy life and actual circumstances? And why that attraction of third person? To befool the audience again? So that they feel attracted to have a fantasy? Are there fantasies really possible? And the actress in lead is trying to have an independent world of hers and she is asking her friend to look for a rental flat! Can’t she do that in Pune for herself? She is also not able to cancel some travel booking online. Again she has relied on her friend to step down the vehicle and do the things for her. And as a matter of fact college does not book any ticket for anyone for any conference. Last but very important, the eldest son in the family gives his approval online for the stay of his sister in the maternal house! He was abroad and giving everyone brief tips about their lives. It’s a hippocratic hodgepodge of characters, acting and climax. Can’t praise actors because they have perfected in playing same roles. They will be progressive in their lives but they don’t want to present example neither through character nor through acting. I remembered Swayamsidhha played by 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒚𝒂 Tendulkar in old TV show.