Hamish Wilson

What a joke of a movie. How can you screw up something so simple. People who gave it 5 stars have the minds of children who are entertained by flashing lights. I also see people saying, "I think the pacing is off and it is not a perfect movie"... but then they still give it 5 stars. Do you not know what 5 stars means? It means it's a perfect movie! These are the kind of idiots who enjoyed the movie and skew the ratings.

The best I can describe this movie is that it is a smart movie for dumb people. People dumb enough to not notice the glaringly obvious plot holes and issues with the science. They will say things like, "if you didn't like it then you didn't understand it". This is a dumb comment for starters. There is no character development and there is no room to breath. Everyone talked double talk, appearing to say smart things but actually saying nothing. The same music plays throughout the entire movie at all the wrong places. A couple of the issues that I noticed straight away are: 1- bullet holes and guns on the ground for events that haven't happened yet... How did those guns and bullet holes get there? Did someone put them there when the building was built? Did they suddenly appear at some stage? 2. When the bullets come out of things the glass etc. repairs itself. The glass isn't time glass so it shouldn't be affected. Right? 3. Finally it seems to me that a person or objects moving backward through time can't be affected by someone moving forward through time and vise versa. Picture one of them shooting the other in the head and tell me what happens... A dumb f#@kn movie for dumb people and I wish I could get my time back.

It's not great writing or animation. And to offset the 5 star bots who don't understand the rating system I'm giving it 1 star instead of 2. But 2 stars is probably pretty generous for this lazy writing.