Top Gun provides plenty of thrilling moments and characters about which the audience can care. The flight scenes work well and provide an edge of the seat experience. Tom Cruise doesn’t miss a step as an older but still heroic Maverick.
This Top Gun, like the original, builds to a conflict and a military action that so strains credulity that I struggled to suspend disbelief. In the original, Maverick prevails in a dog fight with Soviet aircraft. Amidst the cheering on the carrier deck, no one seems to care that the world has catapulted into a conflict likely to lead to nuclear holocaust. In this sequel, I cannot believe that the military strategists would have chosen a naval jet precision flying and bombing action with a high likelihood of failure. I have to imagine the best military on earth had several better options. They used tomahawk missiles to take out the enemy airstrip but chose to use jets flying at low altitude necessitating near impossible maneuvers followed by dogfights with superior aircraft. Thus, I choked on the plot line that was the apex of the movie. (And don’t get me started on the ludicrous escape Maverick and Rooster made in an old jet down a taxi way that happened to be untouched by the Tomahawks. Yikes.)
Finally, I applaud the increased diversity of the Top Gun team. But why did the writers and director make the white, southern jerky guy be the hero who saved a life at the end? There were a couple of black and at least one Hispanic characters that could have been the hero with some minor script tweaks. The main black characters were second in command and supporting team members. The white guys were the leaders and heroes. Splash goes the diversity effort.