I have consciously decided not to read anything else by this sanctimonious blowhard. If we have no free will, why does he keep publishing books and spouting his reactionary opinions on YouTube?
Because he chose to be a sell-out, half-a$$ed philosopher without a single new idea in his head.
No wonder so many so-called "neuroscientists" don't believe in free will: It's because they chose not to have any and have never come up with a single new idea between them.