I decided to watch this movie when I got confused by the reviews, which I generally don't hold with. I usually trust my instincts when I want to watch a movie and mostly don't read them. This time I did and was left bemused.
Critical reviews widely panned this movie, while majority of the audienceย praised it.
In situations like these, I find the reviews of critics misleading and like to go with the audience, this time was no exception. As always, glad I did.
I liked it for its attmpt to uncover the details regarding the controversial death of aย prominent political leader. Dragging, a litttle at times, bit like a documentry some times and has its over dramatic & theatrical moments
as well. Still, I found this movie involving and engaging enough, also seemed to be a well researched one.
Subtle propoganda might be there. Despite this I did not feel it is catering to the requirement of any particular agenda. Mostly it stuck to fact finding.
What I found all the more interesting wasย that the movie presented the case from both angles strongly.
Moreover,the satrical element of the movie spared no one., individuals, groups, parties all bore the brunt.
The prominent cons, among othershortfalls were, the real difficulty to relate to the abrupt and the not so convincing transformation of the protagonist and emotional aspects of the movie .
Itsย a decent film, with some fine acting.
Not a very good film, not a very bad film either.
I am not impolring any one to watch it or get swayed by whatever is written. To each, their own.
This is simply my opinion, right or wrong, as an apolitical person intersted in history and mystety, about a movie, I liked and wanted to write about.