Phil G

It is just an interesting perspective, will you pay to watch this as entertainment? - in the movie she asks towards the end why no one was curious to know who else could have done it - but her story lost credibility as soon as it was revealed that people (albeit on her behalf) lied about aspects of it - also her secret relationship with a married man (revealed at that moment) further weakens her credibility and position. Isn't that perfectly logical especially as the lead of the group who was mobilizing them was found to have lied too? That is very natural and can't be hanged onto the typical male stereotype? The real change is when they shift their stance when they get a once in a lifetime opportunity - again if those 12 were women and not men, will they behave any differently - not so sure - so it's a human greed thing rather than a male only issue? also all are allegations until they are proven - that is the only way to enforce law - it is a different issue that people find ways to circumvent its enforcement through illegal means - but that does not change the principle of its application. In terms of the narrative the only reason as the audience to trust her is that she is not shown to be acting in vendetta and that she did not want to take it forward except that she felt that group wasn't her safe-space anymore.