guywhousesyewtube

Incorporates some stolen work (the reason it was removed from youtube), improper usage of basic logic, and blatantly false or speculative presentations throughout. A brief glance at the 5-star review comments perfectly reflects the level of ignorance one must have to appreciate the perceived assumption that renewable energy isn't an answer (at least in part). One reviewer claims "renewable energy" "violates the laws of physics" showing the entire internet he both doesn't understand what renewable energy is and is also incapable of a simple google search to find out- (Renewable energy is energy that comes from constant processes. For example: a fuel source is combusted or depleted once only, while rivers that naturally flow throughout the year can be harnessed to continually produce energy. Renewable energy does NOT mean that it comes into existence from nothingness or violates the laws of physics in some way.) It's absolutely depressing that what is likely a grown human being doesn't understand this. Another 5-star reviewer seems to believe the Earth is 10,000 years old and that we should use God to explain things rather than the accumulation of human knowledge that continually saves/improves lives in virtually every way such as medicine or you know.... every technology ever down to the clothes we currently wear (but not me, I'm actually naked at this time). Such a shame. It truly deserves a rank lower than 0 for some of the speculative nonsense that unethically impedes progress on renewable development. Reading further, however certain reviews provide in fantastic detail the glaring errors produced in this 'documentary'. Such as comments by Roger Smith and Chris Greacen below.