Greg Pugh

This is one of the best shows for football fans. Great insight on the ins and outs of the game. Usually they're very balanced in their reviews of games but they like most of sports media sometimes goes overboard in their commentary of the shinny object. In reviewing the Cowboys Eagles week 18 game they literally never mentioned the "Eagles" by name. They're normally better then that and shouldn't need DO on set to achieve that balance. After reading some of the comments I had to come back and support Mina Kimes. She is very insightful and knows the game better than a lot of men. If you can't listen to her because of her voice, you have intellectual issues. I remember vividly how people didn't like John Maddens animations, now look at how he is remembered. The same goes for Dick Vitale. True fans of sports that listen to what is spoken and not how it is delivered can appreciate good commentary. Getting hung up on presentation is for corporate environments, one of the things we all say we don't want in our sports.

This is a rah, rah show opposed to a sporting news show. The selection of material is extremely bias towards the teams that the panel have a rooting interest. Example, there were 2 NFL games Tuesday in the middle of wild card races. Wednesday the show started with Lebron James of course even though the Lakers loss and are a .500 team. It went for a full hour before reviewing the Rams/Seahawks game and don't even know if they ever reviewed the Eagles/WFT game. This is a continual issue. HOWEVER, if the Chiefs play the first hour and more is Chiefs coverage. The shame is the viewers actually want their opinions on all these games and they shortchange themselves by not offering it due to bias. I stopped watching the show after I witness this bias repeatedly.