Great acting from Joanne Froggart in lead role (I mean, really, considering the following) but...
What motivated her not to go to the police when 'Ed Harrison' threatened to murder her husband in her name? He told her the missing woman's body was buried at that exact site and had photographic evidence to prove it.
Following her arrest, why wasn't she given legal representation? Why didn't she tell the police about the domestic abuse? Why didn't she ask the police to speak to the dentist who treated her for missing tooth? Why didn't she tell the police about her husband's suspected affair with missing woman? Why didn't she ask the police to examine the photographs on her phone of love letter and nude selfie taken by missing woman? We know she still had her phone, as later the husband uses it to track her.
Why didn't the police question any of the other school mums? Would they have not had suspicions of domestic abuse, as strongly implied when collecting the kids for Halloween party? Is this the one school in the world where no one gossips? Why did the police not find it suspicious that she not one single friend or family member she was close to? That is a classic trait of abusive relationships, whereby the abuser isolates their partner.
Why did she abandon the witness to Ed Harrison's existence, the cashier from the petrol station who was tied up and beaten by him?
Following the beating up of the cashier, she confronted her husband and demanded he confess, which he did. Why did she not use her phone to record the confession, knowing she was going there to 'force' him to confess?
What were the chances the villains were both reading the same book, to get the ripped off plotline from 'Strangers On A Train' going?
Why did the school allow her to collect children in the middle of the day? Were they not aware of her 'mental health disorder' and court ordered restraining order? Again, is this the one school in the world where no one gossips? Had her absence for 6 months not been noted by the teachers?
If the man running the trailer park had the foresight to identify her husband as a threat, and withhold identification, why didn't he warn her of his arrival?
Her collaboration with Theo - highly illegal in numerous ways - is a preposterous plan. Apart from criminalising herself in earnest for the first time, it secured the truth of what really happened from ever getting out. How on earth she could trust Theo, after all that had happened and who was already heavily invested with her husband, is totally unbelievable and completely goes against the character we have been following for six episodes. Everything she has been through, one would have expected to give her trust issues with men, especially repeat offenders who only pretend to have a change of heart. Why would Theo be any different from her husband?
All in all it was just so ridiculous I regretted watching it to the end, which I only did as the opening scene was so traumatic and upsetting, I really wanted to see justice for Angela... the lack of effort made by the creators, the assumptions, the misconceptions, the lack of research into real-world abuse survivors and their stories all manifest as a truly terrible plot. Conspiring to then murder Theo by giving him up to his victim at the end was the final insult and condemns her character as a nasty piece of work, far from being the empowered woman and good mother she is then portrayed as in the closing scenes. I mean, is the moral of the story revenge is a good idea?? So naïve.
Very exploitative, of both audience's emotions invested during first episode and real-world survivors who deserve better.