As usual, Hollywood is bad when it comes to adaptations and respect to the source material. But at least back a decade they tried to do a proper casting ( unlike nowadays, that usually leave only names from the source) . I am not big fan of the book. Yes, it is not perfect , but descent read for one evening. Movie, on the other hand, is worse. And I am not a petty person, I understand that there has to be differences between adaptation and the book. But not a differences that change the point of the story, mind you. In the book we see a strong , but tired woman, that gave everything to her family. In the movie we see hysterical and abusive woman, that easily loosing it, and in the middle of the movie you starting to fear for her family when they are alone with her. In the book we see a lawyer, that has to fight his own demons , he is a central character to the story. In the movie he is irrelevant, for the most part. In the book Kate is bit more manipulative and selfish. In the movie it kinda looks like that she giving up because of tragic love story , and understands how much everyone did for her . She is way more selfless on the screen. In the books Kate is not the main character. Anna is. Anna and Kempbell . They are the main characters. Not in the movie. In the movie their stories are stolen by ...banalities. Book at least trying to raise the problems like bodily autonomy of underage, of hard choices , how much parents actually " own " their children in the story of Anna. Teaches that trust and risk and openness in the relationships are the most important,
in the story of Kempbell. Movie is just a sad story of a slowly dying Kate and her mother that goes insane in a ugly way. Unlike majority of those that both familiar with the book and the movie, I will not criticize the movie for different ending. It is actually " fix me " situation, where movie ending is more logical , and how it supposed to be. Overall, movie gets 3 points from me. For relatively good acting and a cute dog .