Scott Willybob

Only reason why I give it a 2, is because the campaign saves it a bit. But the main factor of Call of Duty, the multiplayer... Sucks. Weapons : Unbalanced Movement : Clunky and Awkward Maps and Spawns : Awful Gunfights : Ugh. Don't even want to go there. This game is not a Call of Duty game, this feels like they tried going into Battlefield (because they did awful with their newest one) while keeping some CoD mechanics. Awful game, really unplayable and not fast paced like a COD game should be. It rewards campers and if someone plays more than you then you know that even if you are twice the player then they are, they are winning the gunfight. I know people will say "Well get good" but why would I get good at such a tragic game, I don't want to to be honest. Unless it seriously changes in an update then it's a waste of money. Also with the rumour that the next year they are going to make you pay for a 2nd part of the campaign and new maps... crazy, it's like they don't get enough money off the game or the battlepass. I guess I am waiting another 2 years before the rumoured AW2 comes out then which when came out was considered bad but the way gaming is now and new mechanics, the only way to keep cod into a fast paced shooter is having Exo Suits, and I think AW had the perfect mechanic for it. I'd still be down for BO3 movement as well if they offered though.