Nabeed Uddin

I think a preferably good book wud have a wiki page filled with the usual glorious stuff (Plot, Character, accolades etc); Vis a vis a nitwit book one, is predominantly deviant of any Amity, ergo a special section called "Controversy" is slided along in the wiki page to distinguish the naughties, and this book has stampeding contradicting views from notable writers scorning Bhyrappa views, on Wiki. Full of passive aggressive Whataboutism and inexistent religious revivalism is the core curb of the writer Bhyrappa's book Aavarana; Pardon the expression, but he is like a sophisticated 'rakhi sawant' of fictional Literature, this book solemnly purposes to render publicity to the writer and weigh discomfort in, otherwise, harmonious society. (Even Aravind Adiga dislikes the likes of him) Fine he provided sourced documentation and stuff in there, but did he explained the context of the antiquity those incidents occurred? There's always a reason for reactions., Even if the injustice occurred, would it be wise to justify the deeds of one antique Ruler, passed on, as a dilapidation for other selected citizens of the country? To be blatant: LOVE JIHAD DOESN'T EXIST, NEITHER DOES GHAR WAPASI. (Although Love exists, transcending beyond bounds) Note: ik, it is prejudiced of me to badmouth these fine piece of literature, as thine belong to the remaining 15% Indians, still and all, this review of mine deserve a 'benefit of a doubt' for the sake sanity and tranquility. So Don't be harsh on this endeavour, i have a right to criticize too. Anyway godspeed y'all.