Negin Kashkooli

This is more of a question rather than a review. Chapter 2 says: "Studying a specific person can be dangerous because we tend to study extreme examples... and extreme examples are often the least applicable to other situations." And all the following chapters talk about at least one outlier(extreme example), if not more. Having the term "Psychology" in the name of the book, I don't think if it's been a coincident, but I cannot decipher why the author took such an approach. I have some thoughts, but I may be wrong. So, reading the book, I suggest that you think about this paradox, as well.