Istvan Mitterpach

Weak science fiction movie , which unfortunately falls short of expectations. The film is plagued by a lack of scientific accuracy and a primitive plotline that fails to engage the viewer. One of the major shortcomings of the film is the complete absence of logical thinking from the filmmakers. The plot is filled with gaping plot holes, inconsistencies, and unexplained phenomena that leave the audience bewildered and confused. The story seems to be hastily put together without any coherent structure, and the movie fails to provide any satisfactory explanations for the various plot twists and turns. Furthermore, the scientific concepts presented in the movie are poorly researched and implemented, making the film seem unrealistic and implausible. The filmmakers appear to have taken a very simplistic and one-dimensional approach to science, which results in a lack of authenticity and credibility. Overall, it is perplexing to see how a movie like "65" managed to secure funding and a theatrical release. The film lacks the necessary elements to hold the viewer's attention and fails to deliver a compelling story that engages and entertains. In conclusion, "65" is a disappointing film that is best avoided.