If you don’t like arthouse films and were looking for The Batman Part 2, you won’t like this film. It’s not for the Hollywood-loving, box-office hit crowd. It’s for the DC fans who wanted something different, and I appreciated it. Everyone complains about how it’s a musical, but it’s done so well and it’s woven in to represent Arthur’s psyche. It’s not meant to be an action-packed thriller - it’s a slow burn and a character piece, sort of like the first one in some ways. The ending sort of pissed me off at first, but after reflecting on it, I actually appreciate it.
As the film got across, *this* Joker is Arthur Fleck, not the Joker we see in the other films. This is not the Joker that’s trying to compete with Heath Ledger or Jack Nicholson. This is the tragic story of a man who was failed by society and it’s a portrait of our failed criminal justice system. It’s a surrealist prison/courtroom satirical drama, not a Marvel superhero film. And, in my, opinion, it was done masterfully.
SPOILER BELOW:
I would have liked to see Arthur *not* turn himself back in to the police and “build the mountain” that Harley wanted them to, but after thinking about it, that isn’t Arthur. As the film got across, *this* Joker is Arthur Fleck, not the Joker we see in the other films. This is not the Joker that’s trying to compete with Heath Ledger or Jack Nicholson. This is the tragic story of a man who was failed by society and it’s a portrait of our failed criminal justice system. It’s a surrealist prison/courtroom satirical drama, not a Marvel superhero film. And, in my, opinion, it was done masterfully.