If you haven’t read the book, you can’t comment on this film. This film was made for fans of the works of William S. Burroughs, a queer author, and if you haven’t read the book you’re going to have very little appreciation for this film. This film is not meant to be representative of the queer community. It is an adaptation of the character portrait, transgressive semiautobiographical novel, “Queer,” which is a sequel to Burrough’s first book, “Junkie.” Queer was written in the 1950s, and it’s meant to be representative of *his* life, not the entire queer community.
If you’re expecting it to be a film written for queer people, that’s not what this film is and you should look elsewhere. This film, like the novel, is a surrealist masterpiece and is very true to the novel. It truly captures the Beat writer’s persona as well as his delinear, symbolic narrative structure, psychedelic style of writing, his body horror, and his pure, desensitizing agony. The sound design is incredible - capturing, surreal, and at appropriate times, horrifying. The film is arthouse cinema, not Hollywood pandering. Guadagnino was the perfect director for this film. I saw influences from Call Me By Your Name and Suspiria in here, and even references to “Naked Lunch.” Bravo. I’d love to see an adaptation of “Junkie” in the future.