Once I watched the trailer, I was deeply disappointed of the way the narrative is subjected, with freedom been served in the plate of mockery. But today I Watched the movie where I felt the work of auteur, director Alankriti Srivastava with the strong and poignant world of feminism which is highlighted through the world of two sisters portrayed by Konkona Sen Sharma and Bhumi Pednekar. It had its revelations and questions with the tone of freedom serving in the stand. They, the women wants to escape from the isolation and the dilapidated reality that is dawned each day as the walk to the same path of self discovery.
You are inferior, why? Because you are not man, who are a women, you are born to be sabotaged by the superiority of the male gaze. The dreams, the way to escape, the sexuality and the urge/pleasure, is a definite arc of the women who are serving the superior their treat of sexuality. The body of the women is not to taste the filth of the demon that forefront them, it's also to take the inch of urge and to stand awake the harsh nature which is put in front of them for years and years....my question is where is the tone of feminism, where are the identity of the women, are they covered under the sheet of dirt. Years will pass but the identity will still be drowning, it's still be pointed by the society, it will be tasted with their body.....nothing will change even if the mind wants to.
Through the eyes of Dolly and Kitty, the director has surpassed the norms and tried to awaken the natural charisma and the wonders without question to sexuality and gender identity. On one hand Dolly is inferior because she can't satisfy the sexual urge of her man and that leaves him to get the cure from some prostitute thus leaving her suffocating of her sexuality. But she finds her freedom from the point of love which is consensual, is that wrong, I don't know but it's strong to be awaken.
Kitty is inferior because he works as a prostitute or in other words she is called as a 'Randi', there to her pleasure of feminism and independence is questioned throughout.....she is not supposed to work with the filth in her face, also not allowed to find love because she has no identity, she is just a prostitute. She is losing her charisma as a individual, her identity and sexuality which is forged and sabotaged by the male.
The director points the layers, deriving the sexual identity and the body , the lose, the mockery to Feminism by the stand ahead men and her toy dream...which just has a question mark.
To me, it had layers of complexity from the arc of women, with her realisation of freedom to escape from the filth and to evoke the sense of her identity. Use of metaphor is earthly the gruesome element which lines the narrative. The depth of the character was missing and the storyline even been taut still little lose.
Lets hope for a world with gender not as a identity but as derivative of the nation.