Iโm fascinated with classic horror films, but this film is just a laughably bad, cynical cash grab trying to hop on the slasher bandwagon, probably, in my opinion, one of the worst films ever made. It seems as if the makers of this film think horror films are nothing more than cheap jump scares and unnecessary cruelty.
Itโs just a predictable motion picture, along with idiotic characters and a poorly done and desperate ad campaign trying to stir controversy. Whoever was behind the marketing should be questioned immediately. The backlash, while understandable, couldโve been avoided if the parents had told their children, Donโt watch it, and donโt make movies like this.
There are two better holiday-themed holiday horror films to this day that are timeless classics: Black Christmas (1974) and Christmas Evil (1980).
If youโre into trash B-movie trash, I might understand the appeal some supporters of the film would say: โOh, itโs just a mindless B movie with a long sympathetic killer backstory.โ And Iโd admit that the concept of child trauma is good on paper, and in some instances the editing, and gore, and cinematography are well made. I love the retro look of this film; itโs pretty amazing. Good work, Charles; unfortunately, he passed away, deeply ashamed of the picture.
But overall the direction, screenplay, acting, and score are overwhelmingly poorly executed. I genuinely donโt understand why thereโs that much backlash against that Siskel & Ebert review; in actuality, I can understand where theyโre coming from. Relax, guys; S&E doesnโt hate horror films in general. You're getting triggered over a television review made in 1984. Grow up; nobody cares. Stop acting like negative reviews of this film donโt exist because they goddamn do, and Iโve read them.
We can easily predict how events would unfold regardless; youโre completely sitting there shaking your head as you watch a bunch of crime footage stitched together. The obvious thing to do was to just place Billy in a therapist; it was the most obvious thing to do and would've spared us an hour. Mother Superior deserved what she got; in the sequel, however, she was an insufferable moron, but the filmmakers were too scared to film a decapitation in front of children, so they said screw it and gave this piece of trash a second life. Why does Billy decide to randomly enter someone's house when he has zero indication of what goes on, who these people are, or what they have anything to do with Billy? Um, how are the cops this stupid at their jobs? Um, how is Billy tall enough to impale someone on a set of antlers? Seriously, this movie's storytelling and logic are a complete travesty.
Yes, I can understand why people enjoy this film. For a slasher film, they actually develop the perpetrators backstory. That gives the film a sort of cautionary tale vibe. There are some wholesome moments here and there, and "Warm Side of the Door" is honestly an underrated gem. Even though the characters murdered in the store aren't entirely innocent, that doesn't justify Billy's actions. In conclusion, Silent Night, Deadly Night contains good special effects and visuals that are far from bad, but its jumbled-up, illogical screenplay is an utter disappointment.
They made sequels to this, and thatโs just Naughty...
2/5 โญ๏ธ I like Pamelaโs tits, though, like seriously, Iโm that horny.