Yes, the content of the book is good, the cause is just, and in spreading the word of how codependency responds in people is all important; I cannot get past the authors three times of quoting a different (and seemingly better by how she describes it) book. If The book, which is quoted three times between pages 30 and 36 is your source and seemingly so much better then why shouldn't I just read that book?
The seemingly better book by the writers constant ommission is titled "Co-Dependency, an emerging issue" and mind you this is in the first couple of pages of the book. At this point I feel as through I should have purchased that book instead.