As uninspired as hollywood action movie can get, story is dumb, plotholes are plenty.
>plotholes:
1. why do they even need to hunt him when he's already being taken to the safe house they wanted?
2. can't the house keeper just shoot rookie or the rogue in the back, instead of going into messy hand combat with him?
3. The top commander just randomly murders other higher officiers not knowing anything for no purpose other than to show to the audience he's baddie, admits to rookie agent of him on the file showing he's baddie?... while the rookie just blindly believes in a rogue, traitor, man under hunt and takes his side? for what? because Danzel Washington looks charming?
4. if the hunters are also CIA, can't they make it into a friendly talk and then suddenly shoot and kill situation, rather than guns blazing assaulting, even directly on well defended and armed safe house?
5. If they're also of the CIA, how could the rookie get away with the rogue agent? aren't they also supposed to know the structure including back door, escape route of the safe house they're assaulting, otherwise how did they win against a well guarded secret safe house?
6. if a simple leak of the file is already enough to cause the effects as in the end of the movie, can't the rogue just directly leak it, or part of the files on internet or any where to cause trouble for the commander hunting him, during the several days they're on the run, during the time when he managed to get away from the rookie agent? instead of running for life keeping and taking it.