The idea behind overwatch lore was fantastic, what they made of it is terrible. Workers behind the game aren't trying to make the game better. You know, there isn'tย a better way to make customers happy thanย listeningย to them to know what works and what doesnt work.ย People working around this game's moderation, matchmaking and ranking system are incapable and they clearly don'tย play their own game to see how awful it is: moderation, MATCHMAKING, patches, balance between heroes, everything is awfullyย made. Don't be surprised if your game has such a low hype around it, overwatch is just a try and uninstall game, and every player that plays it for longer knows how bad this game is maintained. What's sad is that just a few changes would've make this game one of the best but they dont even listen to their customers, they keep patching stuff making the game even more bad. Your rank depends on how lucky you are with the team given to you, you can play play as support 10 times better then enemy supports, you'll still derank because your team wasn't good enough to win the game. Ranking up shouldn't depend on winning or losing the match, it should depend on your personal performance compared to the other players in your game ( wich are supposed to be at same rank as you ), so if you do better: you rank up to get against and with better players in your matches. Actually, if you're playing fine every game, your rank depends on other players in your team every single match. Why not judge if a player deserves a derank or a rank up depending on his personal performance ? Why does the whole team has an impact on a player's rank since they wont even play together the game after ? Ranking system doesn't make sense and it is clearly not the only thing not making sense on this game