Diana S Taranto

Adam Sandler "was robbed " as Kathy Bates advised him. That he didn't win an Oscar for his starring role in "Uncut Gems" was an outrage. The directing was equally deserving of an Oscar nod. Likewise, the screenplay, and the overwhelming score, which conveyed a pounding chaos which coincided with the "in your face" story. All of these components of the film combined to produce a heartpoundingly suspenseful, and tension-filled experience. That the story centered on a compulsive gambler, who seemed determined to bring himself to the brink of disaster evoked a feeling of anger and frustration that he was so determined to sabotage himself at every turn, repeatedly staking his very survival against the potential of an elusive jackpot. As a witness to his addiction, the audience feels the conflict of wanting to bring him under control, while conversely wanting to abandon him to his fatal flaw. But there is no relief. It is a very uncomfortable film to watch. That some viewers gave this film a low rating is indicative I think, of those who perhaps go to the movies to be" entertained" by superheros, car races, and increasingly spectacular explosions, films that allow a couple of hours of easy escapism. "Uncut Gems" is not that type of film. It absorbs you before you can evade its pull. And finally, you find out that you have surrendered your heart to the loser whose story you cannot ignore.

Intense and touching film. The setting is perfect to support the many relationships between characters isolated off the coast of Ireland, Includes existential theme relating to art and humanity. Empathy between animals and their caretakers plays significant role as well. An important film I won’t forget.