The movie "Inside" (2023) left me feeling utterly disappointed and questioning the choices made by the renowned actor, William Defoe, to be a part of such a seemingly pointless film. While I understand that movies can be subjective, this particular production tested my patience and left me feeling unfulfilled.
The film's lack of a meaningful narrative was evident from the start, and it failed to capture my attention throughout its 1 hour and 45 minutes duration. I hoped for a powerful ending that would convey a message of resilience and triumph over life's adversities. Unfortunately, "Inside" fell short in this regard, leaving me questioning the purpose of my investment in watching it.
One of the major drawbacks of the film was its lack of logical coherence. The fact that nobody returned to feed the fish in what appeared to be an isolated apartment was perplexing and unrealistic. Additionally, the initial alarm at the beginning, signaling the presence of valuable art worth millions, went unnoticed by anyone. The absence of any meaningful response to the substantial amount of water resulting from the fire further undermined the film's credibility.
While I understand that "Inside" is a work of fiction, it is important for a movie to maintain some level of practicality and realism to engage the audience. Unfortunately, this film failed to strike that balance, leaving me with a sense of dissatisfaction.
Despite my disappointment, I would like to acknowledge the commendable efforts of the cast and crew. The performances were decent, and the cinematography was visually appealing. However, these aspects alone were not enough to salvage the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Inside" (2023) was a film that lacked meaning, failed to capture my interest, and ultimately left me questioning the choices made by its talented actor. While it had some redeeming qualities, they were overshadowed by the nonsensical plot and unrealistic scenarios. As a result, I can only give this movie a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.