You know, wordles great. It's unintentionally intuitive, essentially solving the easy to learn yet hard to master concept which has created some of the most impactful and most complex games, and It's addictive. It immediately catches the intrigue of anyone crossing its path, essentially a masterpiece. On top of this, even in it's charming nature and astoundingly minimalistic concept, the game is quite complex in itself, something most simple games undervalue, such as tic-tac-toe, a solved game. An average person could master it in a day by simply memorizing the best responses to the few opening positions, then never lose. Quite boring, in fact. However, even when the most complex mathematical approaches regarding information theory and entropy are applied, the best opening approaches are still heavily debated, especially since these are relatively statistical. The point of this review is to say that absolutely nobody is offended by the word slave, fibre, or anything that your political views say you should be "offended" by. Shoving your political agenda into an innocent game's face and down millions of player's throats is a pretty stupid idea, the majority of the 1 star reviews here regard the NYT's absolutely idiotic take of the game. You would think they'd realize it, but I suppose they're too lazy to really actually care about what any normal people think. Removing common words from a word game is dumb, the very fact that I an eighth grader concludes this is beyond, I think, nobodies understanding.