Sajith Ks – Google

MIXED FEELINGS: SPOILERS Pros: The last 15 mins made me cry. Acting of the fathers were top notch. They clearly conveyed the emotions. Cons: 1. I wasn't able to empathise with the group. I agree that all can't be good at studies. But they weren't into any activities or hobbies that would have been a saving grace. They were interested only in alcoholism. 2. The climax lacked silver lining. 3. The relationship between the father and the kids turning into positive note wasn't smooth, rather stuck out like a sore thumb (except Azees and Naseer and their respective kids). What proof did the sons show for the parents to invest money in their business? None. 4. The troubled relationship between the couple wasn't shown, hence the divorce came like a surprise. Could have gone deeper into his character too. 5. They didn't show the process of realisation of Jagadeesh about his wrong ways of bringing up a kid, rather than just few dialogues in the climax. Even that looked like it was written quick. That was another missed opportunity. 6. What was the storyline of the girl in boy cut? She was missing for the rest of the movie. Basically it was a decent movie with great final 15 mins and lots of missed opportunities.

The makers should release another version on Netflix. A 90 min version. The chemistry between the leads was good. The repetitive dialogues were annoying, the climax was sweet. The character of Asif Ali was one dimensional, lacked the reason behind his alcoholism. And the movie failed to convince us on why he wasn’t able to continue his relationship with his girlfriend. And I wasn’t able to empathise with Asif’s reason for living the kind of vagabond life he was living, felt more like a lazy writing. Suraaj’s character had a depth, his misery was something to be empathetic about. I would conclude this movie as a missed opportunity to create something meaningful and feel good .

Well I got mixed feelings. Pattinson, Cinematography and sound design was mind blowing. Story was a let down. Climax seemed lazy writing. Batman's role was akin to that of a guy who was solving wordplay puzzle from the daily news paper. He wasnt able make any difference to the actions of the villain till the end. Even if we remove batman from the first 2 hours and 30 mins from the movie, still the story would have gone in the same direction. Villain killed whomever he wanted. Villain was caught by coincidence and not by batman. the movie was beautifully going through the journey of batman and his inner conflicts but in the end, the movie turned into a Roland Emmerich disaster movie RATHER THAN FOCUSING ON Batman's issue with Falconi and Riddler. The final sequence was with some random folks whom we had no idea about till the end.

Amazing but lazy convincing skills of writers: (SPOILERS) I had a real good time. I felt nostalgic. Andrew Garfield stole the show. But it felt like characters were stupid at many places like characters in a horror movie running towards the dark basement even though we scream at them not to go there. For instances, Dr. Strange was the most stupid. Inspite of having a huge experience, fighting in many wars, he knew the repercussions of messing with spells. Yet he did it just because Spiderman and his friends didn't get through MIT? I mean seriously? We deserved a more convincing plot there. Secondly, Aunt May was stupid, so was Tom Holland. He fought in Infinity war n endgame, killing many monsters and now, when its time to either send the villains back or put lives of many people in danger, he wanted to save the villians? Felt like chic flick philosophy. This is where DC shines. And Ned anc MJ didn't press the button even after they saw the destruction the villains caused, in the news? Sandman started fighting against Spiderman for what reason? Suddenly he became a villain when spiderman sensed the intention of green Goblin. All these made me feel like the writers thought we are stupid and would accept anything because of the fandom spiderman has. Yet it was a kickass movie. The chemistry of three spiderman were really good. Extremely good. Funny. Andrew Garfield was.... Phew. I wanna see his solo spiderman movie. And Tom Holland is no more a teenage guy in terms of his emotional experience. He's now an adult. That was a great character arch. In a nutshell, It was fun and emotional. But just like Scorsese says, it was like a ride at the amusement park. But I would rather spend 4 hours watching Snyder cut or Infinity War+ Endgame. Though they had plot holes, the motivations of characters were strong and convincing.