This movie, shot somewhat like a documentary, was painful to get through. When I saw the cast of Murphy and Hill I was initially curious. I really love almost everything that Eddie Murphy has been a part of since the beginning of his career. He never seems to fail, until it comes to this character. There were some decent interactions between the father and his brother, but the rest of the time the role could have been played by anyone, there was nothing there, no effort, no glimmer of that Murphy star or energy. It was like watching the last decade of Willis just dialling it in.
One of the most frustrating things about the movie are the multiple scenes that rely on second-hand or third-hand knowledge of references that are meaningful or applicable to a narrow community within LA/Hollywood. There was one scene between Hillโs character and his podcast co-star where they spoke in references for the entire thing. Iโm no stranger to hip hop, but I literally had no idea who this scene, or the movie overall is for? It doesnโt have international or wide audience appeal. Thatโs fine, but perhaps it needs a new label, because although there were a few minor laugh out loud moments this movie was painful to watch and not at all funny.
Iโve started to notice a trend of dramas being called comedies lately. Itโs like the producers arenโt ballsy enough to call a drama a drama and just splice some funny scenes into it and pop the movie in a more marketable genre for profit. Itโs sly. I donโt want to dis anyoneโs appearance in particular, but Jonah Hill needs to start taking better care of himself, Eddie Murphy looks younger than him in this movie. Heโs supposed to be playing a 35 year-old, but he looks exhausted.
I think the mirroring of the conflicts between the mother-in-law and daughter-in law and the son-in-law and father-in-law just werenโt comparable experiences and came off as ill-conceived. David Duchovny was phenomenal in this role and was the only person who seemed to get this character. I feel like there were moments here that worked so much better in 'Meet the Parents' like when Stiller and DeNiro have their awkward exchanges at the dining table and ultimately Stillerโs Focker knocks the ashes off the mantel and the cat urinates in them. The equivalent here being the candle in the Islamic hat and it being burnt and stepped on. I saw it coming a mile off and it didnโt pay off. I just found it to be not in-line with the tone of the rest of the movie.
I canโt fault the acting of the main actress, she was great throughout, although are people really like that, so up and down, aggressive and then nice? It seemed odd. Every couple has issues, but as in the ultimate message of this mess, love conquers all. Nothing ever comes of Murphy videoing Hill acting the fool on the basketball court in an โAlong Came Polly / White Men Canโt Jumpโ mash-up. Itโs clear where Jonah Hill got his influence from. You can imagine him and Rogan sitting around the bong one nightโฆโDude, you know what would be cool?โ. โDude, tell me broโ. โIf we rip off Stiller's classics and add black peopleโ โYeah bro, that would be so Zeitgeistโ.
Overall, despite its rare and infrequent charm, the only lasting impression this movie leaves is one of virtue signally, patronizing instructions on how to navigate Western American cultural issues and one of sincere loss for the days when comedies were actually, you know, funny! Fun to watch, with some silliness and not all about โTHE MESSAGEโ. File this one under BLM for Boring Lame Movies.