Robert Sockwell

The characters were developed to show their frailties in a more intimate way than in the original series, IMO. None have been created as being either pure, or immortal. All have flaws, marred histories, hidden strengths, fears & desires. I appreciate their weaknesses, aspirations and on & off hopelessness and helplessness in the post-apocalyptic survival world of their existance. The gratuitous amount of blood and gore has become to me a mere "backdrop" to the stories being told. I would recommend this series, but not without one having "endured" series one's horrors, since there are certain important tieins to earlier "Walking Dead" series.

The movie was intense, riveting, sad and the ending left me worn out, not wanting to see it again.

First episode was intriguing but the ending did not explain the little Loretta's future existence potential. It just concluded Alma's permanent disappearance.

This is a truly heartwarming saga of lives entwined by happiness, tragedy, hopefullness, and dispair, all carefully wrapped within complicated interpersonal relationships in a small rural community. The plot threads are engaging, cleverly disguised, and successfully woven into memorable life stories through well-developed characters.

Season 2: The mars pathegin outbreak mirrors the political and economic impacts in the USA of the Coronavirus in its clear and concise depiction of its progression through the colony, in my opinion. Season 2 is a hallmark of similarities to a real life situation.

Well done, timeless value. A movie to think about, regardless the race aspect.

Very engaging, moving, especially strong character-building. "believable".

The current show is riviting. Dr. Smith is sinister. Youst on season 1