Ah, Dreamworks' 2-D animation days, like The Prince of Egypt, Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, and The Road to El Dorado.
Many people in the reviews have complained about Chel not being a good role model, and I can see where they're coming from. But I feel like people are fans of Chel the same way they like "bad" characters, such as Grunkle Stan from Gravity Falls, or Eda the Owl Lady from The Owl House. People just like them as a character and how they contribute to the story. I like Chel's quest for adventure, and I wouldn't say she's generally evil nor purely good. And if you don't think your kiddo is ready to watch this film yet, then that's fine. The film is rated PG, but that doesn't mean everyone will handle it the same way, of course. I think a teen or tween audience will enjoy the movie more and understand that it's just trying to have fun. I'm sure lil' kiddos will like the movie, too, but I think an older audience will make the most of it and appreciate it better.
Anyway, I liked the main characters, Tulio and Miguel. They were funny, comfortable with each other, and humorously petty at times. Speaking of comedy, it is mostly straightforward and ironic, like when that shark ate the seagull (Miguel and Tulio's only food) and, like, half of the boat paddle.
The art style is beautiful and geometric (?) with patterns and organic shapes. I love the design and fantasy creatures of El Dorado, like the giant, colorful fish, birds, and turtle-looking-thing, the golden butterflies, the lively greenery, and the warm red-gold dominant colors. I believe the team put a lot of thought, care, and effort into the character animation. For example, Chel walks in a way that seems sneaky, quick, yet flowy. It makes her goal of escaping El Dorado believable. The culture in the film reminded me of the culture from The Emperor's New Groove (which I found funnier).
Yes, there are some weird, "not-as-brief-as-I-thought" moments, but they're watch-able, depending on how sensitive you are.
I enjoyed the magic, spells, and potions in the movie. It made me wonder how it exists, how the people discovered it, and what other types of magic there are.
I thought Miguel and Tulio's reaction to being caught lying about being gods was pretty genius. They put on a show and argued to distract the one magical guy, like in the beginning of the movie.
I have some questions, though. Did the chief know Tulio and Miguel were human all along by telling them "to err is human"? If he did, why did he let them get away with lying and almost stealing hundreds of gold objects? And do the people of El Dorado still think that Miguel and Tulio are gods? I feel like they deserve to know the truth.
I don't quite understand those medium, possibly-fake, scores from the "big reviewing companies". I thought the movie was beautifully produced with no major "problems", and everyone pretty much got what they deserved. In the end, Miguel and Tulio didn't get exactly what they wanted (gold and to be kings of Spain) because of the way they wanted it (by lying to an entire city of people) but they realized they got something better, which were new companions, Chel and Altivo.
I thought the music would really reflect the culture of the people from El Dorado, but it was still good though. The dramatic Spanish guitar was on point. I liked the "cartoony" sound effects, like the scratched record, "scoring points", and squeaking.
XOXO, Timmy's dad/ Mr. Turner