Claire Turner

I'd give it zero if I could. To put it into context, it's the equivalent of someone making a TV adaptation of Harry Potter where Dumbledore (Moiraine) was the main character, and female. Harry (Rand) would just be an unfortunate side character who was occasionally given screen time to keep the story going, Molly Weasley (Natti Cauthon) was a drunk and Arthur Weasley (Abell Cauthon) an aggressive womaniser. Oh and Hermione (Egwene) did no wrong because she was female, meaning that her character arc ultimately doesn't exist. It's that bad. Which leaves Ron (Mat) to abandon his friends but never actually come back. In the Wheel of Time TV "adaptation" all male characters are belittled in favour of female ones, the whole point is lost on the show runner and almost all of the names are pronounced wrong despite there being a glossary in the actual books. Awful.

Great cast and performances. The film itself I found pretty dull though and I cared nothing for any of the characters by the end. Don't see why it's so well regarded personally

Really boring. I gave it a solid chance, watched first two episodes, which are just over 2 hours in total, equivalent to some feature length films, and it was just dull. Have not played the games and probably won't now. I don't get the hype, it did absolutely nothing for me. Also I thought the soundtrack was dreadful

It's not meant to be a serious film. It's an easy-to-watch comedy for simple entertainment that you don't need to think about. I had a good laugh, thought comedy was on point. Don't understand all the hate. Yes, accents were a little iffy but it's just meant to be a bit of fun! Can recommend

Very witty and perfect length. Diane Morgan nails it once again

So bad. Giving it one star because I can't give it 0