Sandra Limpert

It wasn't quite what I expected, but it did give a fairly good depiction of what goes on inside the jury room. My one main critique is that the jurors kept arriving 8 days in a row - but always wearing the same clothes! That suggests filming of jury scenes was done in one day??? I mean, absolutely no one wears the same clothing 8 days straight - with the exception of "Mr. Monk", but that's because he owns duplicates of the same clothing. In real life, that generally doesn't happen. So that's my main critique. Not enough wardrobe changes for the jurors, which would have made the series more believable, imo. I have to give a shout out to the actor who played Shaun Yang. He had no lines to speak of, but his face, eyes, and body language spoke volumes. I think that's far more difficult to do without lines, and so I think he deserves recognition for his ability to emote non-verbally. Kudos to the actor. Otherwise, I kept thinking, when all the jury members kept thinking of scenarios, that their only job was to decide if the prosecution had proven Mr. Yang's innocence beyond reasonable doubt. I think many of them allowed their personal prejudices and experiences to overshadow their critical and analytical thinking, which happens with some juries. I think the series did a good job of subtly pointing that out without being too overt about it. Honestly, I'm by no means a fan of reality TV and don't watch it, but this series captured my attention because off my interest in psychology and law. And, because it was a short series, I decided to watch it. I can't say I was disappointed, except for the aforementioned lack of wardrobe changes by jury members. If they had another such series, I would probably watch it.