Sarv Sahi

is it really that difficult to understand that telling a little girl her mother didn't want her is different from telling an adult woman the same truth? Yes. it will hurt in both scenarios but the psychological capacities of a child and a mature woman differs so greatly, not considering it is absolute stupidity. I am so sick of this cliche plot in which children blame their parents for such cases. And it is just wrong. And how the girl starts paying attention and fascination to her newly found mom like a little kid who has found a new toy is just so childish and immature. Ignore the parents who had stayed with you, loved you, taken care of you and go play with the new parent! How mature is that!

You should have called this movie "Invasion on Paradise". I wished you were at lest ashamed of what you have done to the original inhabitants of that continent but you're not.

I can't believe they have made this movie to celebrate this guy and make him look like a hero; a lier, a scientific fraud who used fake data from never-done or manipulated experiments to make immorality become the norm. From now on I will never ever watch any movies with Liam Neeson or Peter Sarsgad or any other actors among the cast of this filthy film. Those who let their fame be used in lying to people are not worth spending time on.

Spoiler: they live in a town where creatures tear people apart at night if they are not protected by some stones, but the nurse and the deputy think Boyd is losing it because he says he has worms under his skin given to him by Martin. YEAH! :)))))))

I liked the original Disney animation as a kid and I liked this version, too. BUT wasn't the Prince supposed to learn to see and love the beauty beyond the surface? Loving Belle is not that difficult. She is beautiful and kind and caring. It was loving the Beast that was the difficult part. So basically Belle learned to do what the prince was supposed to learn and do. It's kind of funny how the result achieved is the exact opposite of the result intended. :)

Fellow ladies! You do know that all these cinematic lies about women having been in power and politically capable of ruling and changing things in an ancient past has been designed to make you feel inadequate even more than the dominant males of your surrounding have made you do itll now? "If you are being abused constantly by your male superiors at work, if you are being treated harshly or cruelly or if you are being suppressed, it is your own inadequacy, weakness and dumbness. Look! Women were such and such in the past." The same trick used for racial and religious minorities when they use actors of Asian or African origins in film and TV series to create the illusion of equality in european countries.

The worst film version of a Jane Austin novel ever.

Gave it a 5 just cause of Dan Stevens naughty David. Spoilers: So basically this military experiment is just indestructible and if the girl had not played detective her parents and all those people in the diner would have not died. With this type of films one doesn't know how to feel; sympathise with David or with Caleb's family. Was Caleb also tested on but did not survive? It seemed to me that David actually wanted to help but his brain worked the way the US military wanted it to, ie to get results an way possible even if it means killing mercilessly.

You do know that the whole AI theory is a sham, right? It is possible to make a system super fast super capable in collecting data and analysing it to find behavioral patterns for example but anything beyond that is just the superstition of the 21st century.

1. Prophet Ebrahim had so many sons the fist of which was Esmaeel. 2. It was Esmaeel that Allah wanted Prophet Ebrahim to offer to him, his first born son, not Eshagh. The productions of Satanicwood is becoming more and more satanic by the day. Son Jews will completely deny the existence of Esmaeel altogether and claim that Prophet Ebrahim had only one son and that was Eshagh. So shameful!