Manoj Paul

There were several gaps in the movie. The storyline felt disconnected in many places, and some scenes lacked proper explanation or transition. Important plot points were either rushed or left unresolved, making it difficult to follow the narrative smoothly. The movie could have benefited from better editing and a stronger script to maintain consistency.

Not so good, < 1 time watchable

Utterly disgusting. Story was catchy but really dirty to watch.

Misguided Narrative Undermining National Interests It's hard to believe that a film like this is receiving positive ratings on platforms like IMDB, especially when its core message feels like a propaganda piece sponsored by Pakistan. The movie goes out of its way to glorify the ISI while portraying our own intelligence agency, RAW, as incompetent, corrupt, or even villainous. This is not just an artistic choice—it seems like an intentional misrepresentation that undermines the real efforts and sacrifices made by our security forces. The portrayal of the ISI as heroes while creating a negative image of RAW is troubling. It turns a real-world, ongoing conflict into a lopsided narrative where the enemy is romanticized, and our own national interests are vilified. Such a depiction not only feels dishonest but also deeply disrespectful to those who work tirelessly to protect the nation. What’s even more frustrating is how this film slipped past public scrutiny and landed on a platform like Netflix, a service that has been repeatedly accused of pushing controversial or insensitive content that disregards the sentiments of its audience. Once again, Netflix seems tone-deaf to the values and emotions of its viewers. While artistic expression is important, there is a line between creativity and spreading narratives that harm national unity. People need to be more aware of what’s being subtly pushed through these films. It's time we critically evaluate such content before celebrating it, understanding the bigger picture it tries to paint.

The recent release of *#IC814TheKandaharHijack* on Netflix, directed by Anubhav Sinha, has sparked significant controversy for its portrayal of the infamous 1999 hijacking of Flight IC-814. The series has been criticized for distorting historical facts and attempting to whitewash the horrific acts committed by Islamic terrorists during the hijacking. One of the most glaring issues is the inexplicable decision to change the names of the hijackers, who were originally identified as Ibrahim Athar, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Zahoor Mistry, and Shakir. Instead, the series portrays these individuals with generic names like "Chief," "Doctor," "Burger," "Shankar," and "Bhola." This not only undermines the gravity of the actual events but also seems to deliberately shift the narrative away from the real culprits by assigning them Hindu names like "Shankar" and "Bhola." This kind of rewriting of history is both misleading and offensive, especially to those who remember the traumatic events of the hijacking. The series also raises concerns for its portrayal of the Taliban and the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence agency, whose involvement in the hijacking has been well-documented. Instead of depicting the Taliban's notorious role in harboring and aiding terrorists, the series shockingly portrays them in a positive light, even going as far as to show the hijackers playing games like antakshari with the passengers. This trivialization of a deadly and traumatic event is a gross misrepresentation of the truth. The latest release appears to follow this troubling trend, which can be seen as an insult to the victims of terrorism and the brave soldiers who protect our nation from such threats. In conclusion, *#IC814TheKandaharHijack* is a deeply problematic series that fails to respect historical accuracy and the memories of those who suffered during the 1999 hijacking. It’s a disappointing addition to Bollywood’s history of controversial portrayals of real-life criminals and terrorists. For those looking for a factual recounting of the IC-814 hijacking, this series is not recommended.

Not so good, just an average one.

Overrated but a onetime watch Overrated but a onetime watch

Didn't got to know about the movie before. Watched it as IMDB has rating 9+, and also its on the Kashmiri people. Very poor direction, but liked the locations shown in the movie, its beautiful. The movie is way better than 2020 movie "Shikara", unlike, they have shown the cruelty which the bad people have done to the Pandits. Also liked how the movie ended with article 370 abrogation. But it could have been way better and not a 9+ rating deserving in IMDB. My rating would have been 4 in IMDB.

Good to know on history, but average scripts.

Underrated - Good acting - all of them. A few dull moments but very entertaining, a must watch.