Not an objective analysis at all. Many unanswered questions & many questions not asked. Such as: What was Casey & Caylee’s daily routine? Did the parents think or know if Casey was working somewhere & if so, where that was? If she wasn’t working, why would she need a nanny? Was Casey living at home with her parents? If so wouldn’t they know if Caylee had a nanny & who that nanny was? Was there any investigation into Casey having access to Xanax? Casey said her father George handed her Caylee’s lifeless, cold body & he told her Caylee had drowned in the pool. Was Caylee’s body wet when she held her? Was George wet from going in pool to get her? No one tried CPR? She kept saying in interview she believed Caylee was ok. How could she believe that after holding her lifeless, cold body? Then later in interview, she said Caylee had not drowned. If George killed Caylee, he certainly could have come up with a better story, plan, method & place to dispose of Caylee’s body & leaving so much evidence with the body. After all, he’s an ex cop,The mother said Casey’s car had the smell of death. She’s a nurse. She probably knows. Yet this was evidently disregarded by jury after defense presented the “junk science” as part of their defense. This family is certainly messed up & Casey may have been abused which could have screwed her up enough to detach herself emotionally to be capable of killing her child. Casey had a very selective memory. She could not remember a lot when it came to the events before & after Caylee’s alleged disappearance but she remembered in great detail events pertaining to herself. She cried continually about her pain & suffering & never mentioned once the pain & suffering Caylee may have suffered in losing her life. Also that Casey’s lawyers didn’t ask her about what happened to Caylee is disturbing, It is an indication to me that what they cared about was winning the case & not the truth. Casey May have not murdered her child but she is certainly solely responsible for Caylee’s death.