I am amaze how the trolls, loyalist with tunnel vision and paid reviewers are invading google review to pump up the star review.
If it is a regular non fictiom film, i'll probably give a higher star. However it tries to represent the actual history which there are a lot of inconsistency to the actual records making it a revisionism of history.
Revising history is not bad however it should be based on valid and factual evidence that came from those years. Using the contraversy family as evidence and source of their side of story is a self serving one as everyone has the right against self incrimination. Who in the right mind will admit their mistakes especially at this grand level. Therefore, the story is bias and not well represented.
The best way to present their side of the story is by 3rd party with factual evidence as the approach would be in neutral state.
Any of the review that is showing 5 star is their preference that can be due to being blinded of idolization, paid review, angry to the other political parties.
In my case this review is based on neutral state of the movie with some basis of history.