And I'm generous w/ 3 stars... rats...
Here's the main problem: I didn't give a hoot what happened to who, the character development is that weak. I'm not going to go into the plot etc b/c you dear reader have already seen some sort of synopsis of this tale.
The main character, Rowan Mayfair, is portrayed so poorly. Other than some ghosty/demon-y kind of entity charms her right out of her panties, there's absolutely NO reason for her to behave as she has.
This is based on a series of books by Ann Rice I read >30 years ago, and I've forgotten much of the books' content. I can say with confidence that it was much better written, b/c I read the entire series one after another. This TV show was a chore to get through. By the time I was fed up w/ it, I was in ep 6/8 so I gave it that last hurrah for the final 2 episodes.
I (((guess))) the performers did the best they could w/ what they had as a script, and the same for the director. Some of the performers were odd as hell, but I couldn't put my finger on it if it was the character or just the actress. I THINK it was just the poor, poor writing.
Here's the huge problem adaptors of novels face: in a film you can't climb into the head of the main character the way you can in a novel. The sad thing is that this obstacle is so easily overcome in an adaptation by simply adding a side kick to the main character. Yes, a departure from the novel, sure; BUT now there's a sounding board for the MC to SHOW their evolution w/in the story. Sheesh. This is scriptwriting 101 for god's sake!
I won't be watching followup seasons, and TBH, I won't be watching Interview With The Vampire now.
Hollywood really, REALLY needs to invest in developing writing talent. This is absurd. So many, many fantastic properties have been hobbled by not paying attention to the nature of film/ theater/ TV:
IT'S THE STORY, DUMMY! Nail that down, and then you do all the gee-whiz production. And when you don't, you get dreck such as this series.