Very good book. As a purist in classical physics she questions the scientific method and admits to the limitations of science. However, she makes some illogical fallacies in her arguments. She asks a philosophical question like, does the universe think? She compares the cosmic web to our brains which is similar somewhat in structure. Her mistake is that there is no evidence so she reject s it based on her classical mechanics view of the world which exposes her own weakness. She asks a philosophical question and tries to answer it with evidence. She doesn't recognize her own flaws. She criticizes Godel's Incompleteness theorem by just stating the human being has more information. I totally disagree with her conclusion because there are many other examples of Godel's Incompleteness theorem which proves the accurateness of Godel like Chinese Box experiment by John Searle. She also tries to discuss free will and fails to provide any conclusive justification. Overall 3.5 stars out of 5. I do agree with her disagreeing with Sam Harris that human beings should build their own morals and values.