Elma Quinzon

The movie was so boring I had to skip it for me to know what happened at the end. The style of this movie is similar to the World War Z movie, and the constant emphasizing of people talking as well as unnecessary sounds was poorly thoughout. Seriously, scriptwriters and directors keep on remaking movies these days but they don't know try to make an effort in studying and learning those old movies, why the old movies are still golden and famous up to this day. With all the jump scares and poorly written dialogue because everything is so cliche, this was made to be a "unnecessary remake but people would still buy it out of curiosity so directors and scriptwriters don't need to work hard since people would still spend on something that's not worth paying for" movie. Luckily i didn't watch this in the cinema even though i was curious about it. I though this'll keep me awake but it didn't. Where are the scriptwriters who made amazing fictional stories and plot twists? They've been replaced by incompetent fools.

The male actor, all he does is shout in the movie trying to look like he's a funny character which was so annoying. All of the actors and actresses in the family of the male lead character is so forced in being funny. This movie could've been more interesting if they kept this to be the serious movie as it portrays instead of forcing everything to be a comedy. Not all directors and scriptwrites as well as actors and actresses can't pull off a comedy movie, this Blue Beetle flatout became a boring, trying-so-hard-to-be-funny film. This is the most annoying, boring, and not so impactful movie I've ever watched, wasted my time watching this though i kept skipping the scenes. It was a great at the start, but everything became a drag when it was at the part where the character was with his family holding that box where the beetle was. Even the ending was too boring, like a copy of the Spiderman movies, all of the Spiderman movie. Seriously, where did these scriptwriters and directors came from? Did they really graduate according to the job they're in? I see a lot of potential on some actors and actresses in this movie but it was wasted because of the poor writing and making of this film. Note: they need more workshops and training because they seriously need to work on how to act when it comes to a touchy/sad part of the story. Kids these days think what they did was enough but they're doing the bare minimum unlike the actors in the past. The old generation could and knows how to act everything. Profits and investments are good for the business, but if the product of "daddy" or "mommy" doesn't provide great quality, profit earned is lost when the film their in doesn't sell so why the hell this is not in the head of all businessmen in entertainment industry?

For me, the movie is so boring I had to skip it just to know what happens next. The director is so desperate to make some scenes "mind-boggling" and "amazing" and "scary" by putting on some unecessary and annoying loud music on scenes that doesn't need it. Like seriously? The movie has a good story plot but the music as well as the scenes created by scriptwriters made it too boring and annoying. They wasted such great actors in making a half-baked script. I feel like this is a demon version of Jesus' story which is a mock to God and it frustrates me.

For me, the movie is so boring I had to skip it just to know what happens next. The director is so desperate to make some scenes "mind-boggling" and "amazing" and "scary" by putting on some unecessary and annoying loud music on scenes that doesn't need it. Like seriously? The movie has a good story plot but the music as well as the scenes created by scriptwriters made it too boring and annoying. They wasted such great actors in making a half-baked script.

The movie became "School for good and evil: Agatha and Tedros, ft. Rafal and Sophie" instead of "School for good and evil: Agatha and Sophie". Sarah Hyland is perfect to be Sophie judging her skills in a series she starred. The book is about 2 sisters entering the school and not the cliche love story where a girl ends up with a boy. That's what the writer wanted. It's a beginner book for kids without having to read many kissing scenes from typical teen adult fiction books. The cute and beautiful moments Agatha and Sophie had when Agatha always mogrified to help Sophie with her studies were vital in showing the love and goodness Agatha have. The scriptwriter and director shouldn't have get scenes from all of the books and make it a one movie. IF YOUR ACTORS CANT ACT ESPECIALLY THAT AGATHA ACTRESS THEN REPLACE HER. ALL SHE DID WAS SHOUT AND NO EMOTIONS WERE SHOWN. As always, being a villain is always the easy role, but being the good character is hard for some actors and actresses to do. If you can't pay for those big actors and actresses, you should've waited for the right time in looking for a better actress. First of all, Professor Sader is THE MOST IMPORTANT character in the book because he's the person who guided Agatha throughout the book. He was like a FATHER to her. And where was Merlin in the picture? SCRATCHED OFF THE MOVIE. Second, getting all scenes from all of the books, you could've just made a SERIES instead of a MOVIE to include every important scene. The painting of Tedro's mother which was a way of teleportation. The bridge where Agatha uses to cross the school for Evil which is VITAL to the story. Robinhood and the gang. Merlin's hat where you can be inside to see the universe. The underground council members which were graduates from their own tales. The black cat who is the leader of the cat family which their "people" were mice. The evil Twins. Everything and everyone has been removed from the movie. I was so happy because the woman from "The Hunstman" movie was part of the film and she's a villain, but the directors and scriptwriters just ruined her reputation as well as the book and the Writer himself which is Soman Chainani. Let me write this down for once: THE BOOK BECAME WELL-KNOWN BECAUSE IT IS OUT OF THE ORDINARY FAIRY TALES WHICH IS GOOD FOR ALL AGES SINCE IT HAS MINIMAL ADULT SCENES. You won't be able to make a masterpiece of a film if you don't follow the footsteps of the writers of Narnia and Harry Potter which they insisted in following what's written in the books and not the egos of the scriptwriters and directors who only knows profit that never understands the reason why a book is LOVED BY MANY. If you can't have a great actress who will play as Agatha, you could've just waited for the right time. The actress of Agatha in the film seems like she doesn't want herself to be seen as an ugly person, if she can't sacrifice her image for the role, she doesn't deserve the role. Getting high-paid actresses won't make the movie do good when it comes to profit because at the end of the day, if the characters are sabotaged, no high-paid actors and actresses won't be able to help to bring in more profit. Note: if you're too scared for the popularity of the book to fade, it's greed, and greed ruins everything. This film is a good example of greed gone bad.