Venkatesh Patnaik

Review: **Non-spoiler Section:** The central theme of "Animal," revolving around the complex dynamics of father-son relationships, falls short of delivering any meaningful insight. The film raises concerns about the potential negative influence on young audiences due to the portrayal of unethical characters. On a positive note, Ranbir Kapoor's acting deserves commendation, as he seamlessly embodies his character. In summary: 1. The 3.5-hour runtime could be condensed into 20 minutes without losing substance. 2. Initial engagement wanes after the first 10 minutes. 3. The fight scenes, exceeding the limits of dramatic, border on implausible even for Bollywood. 4. The film appears to emulate a "wannabe Hollywood" style with gratuitous gory scenes. Should you watch it? Only if you have four hours to spare and a tolerance for disappointment. **Spoiler Section:** The movie falters in justifying and developing its characters: 1. Vijay's unwavering attachment to his father lacks sufficient explanation. 2. Despite claiming alpha status initially, Vijay succumbs to toxic masculinity. 3. The late introduction of the villain, Abrar, culminates in a lackluster showdown. 4. Abrar's brother's intense attachment doesn't translate into meaningful action during Abrar's demise. 5. Vijay criticizes Balbir's failures as a father while himself falling short as a husband and father. 6. Vijay's purported alpha traits dissipate in his dealings with Geetanjali and his children. 7. The plot unfolds with improbable ease: convincing cousins to avenge, training them effortlessly, procuring weapons, and traveling to Scotland. and what not.. In my view, "Animal" stands as the worst movie I've ever seen.