The book is very selective in its quotes from the Old Testament.
It does not give a convincing evidence of the continuity between the Old Tesatment and the New Testament..
I realize that A. La Coque & Paul Ricoeur are world renown scholars,
Their scholarship is beyond doubt into objectivity, but as a layman I
did not experience the validity of their account of the selected parts
that they have elaborated on. The O.T. was never a source of devotion to the Christianity of the New Testament, I wonder if I am
alone in this impression. Has there been any critics of Thinking Biblically?