The biased interview with Elaine contained fictional claims. The UK trial was not JD against AH. He did not have a chance there. The judge was dirty. Also, in fact AH team did bring in the UK trial in their rebuttal cross with JD. They also told the jury that he had already had his chance.
She didn't turn in her "mountain of evidence". Our judicial system decided they didn't believe her and here you are giving her counsel a platform to say the jury is wrong and did their job with bias.
Such a joke of reporting and spreading more misinformation! MSM has a narrative to keep going I suppose. This case has really opened my eyes to MSM. I believed they showed us and told us the truth. I'm disappointed to learn the opposite.