Core Diagram

Different type of Superman. More raw. Vulnerable. Part of the crowd. The story is a bit let-off because when you anticipate a Superman movie, you want to see more progressive cohesion. The danger was the rift, the clone and Lex and they were all purported by Lex. Not much going for the story. The visual effects were awesome. The acting was fine but I have to say that this new Superman may not ring with all fans. The costume though. I prefer the previous Superman's costume. 4 out of 5.

LOL LMAO HAHAHAHAHA HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE LOL LMAO LMFAO

This movie glorifies madness, unleashing madness from the prison of the purgatory, being ruthless, murder, rage, violence and a whole lot of shit-talking. It also glorifies the rogue-archetype while acknowledging the globally prevalent norm that rogues cannot get things done alone. Judging by the high performance and success of this movie, it proves that the audience doesn't give a damn about these things and they're a very repressed bunch who are unaware that they have a repressed penchant for madness and bloodlust. Also, as a piece of anti-superhero fiction, it must be said that a lot of philosophies, lifestyle-promotions and ideologies represented by this movie is delusional. It is only during the end of the movie that they go the traditional way of sacrifice. I personally did not find this movie to be deserving of a 5 star or a 4 star rating. It's an average movie whose success was heavily dependent on real-world influence and not deserved intrinsically. 3 stars.

Entertaining but predictable plot. They call this the "spark"? Lol 🤣🤣🤣

This animated series was made by someone who doesn't respect the Gods. Or God. He deliberately collected the worst myths of the Norse pantheon and inverted their depictions as villains. He did not even attempt to portray them in a good light or even in a neutral way. He does not understand that if legends of Gods are still existing, they do so for their own merits. These merits are forgotten to time. I wish him good luck in the afterlife because every action, thought or emotion has to be accounted for, later-on. As a piece of entertainment, it has barbarism, extreme violence, murder, sex, LGBT, consumption of substances and alcohol, etc. There is not much to the story. It's just a revenge plot. He also tries to invert good to evil, evil to good, nice to bad, bad to good, etc. 2 out of 5. To be watched with full awareness that this is fiction. Also, this series is not for teenagers because of gullible minds that tend to worship anything that is depicted in a cool and stylish way.

Lol. .

They basically turned the Jedi into murderers of an entire witch clan and the parents of the two twins. What sort of protagonist murders the parents and then adopts one of the children? On top of that they promoted mixed signs by having the villain Sith choosing to wear a helmet for sensory deprivation. It's like they're saying whoever chooses sensory deprivation are villains and Sith. Voluntary sensory deprivation is a basic requirement of meditation. This is present in Hinduism and Buddhism and perhaps many other lesser-known Eastern religions. I find it odd and amusing that this show wants to promote the Sith as good and the Jedi as some incompetent murdering buffoons that incite war for nothing. Instead of choosing to villainize the Jedi, they should've glorified the Sith. After-all USA is an exemplary country with marked actions and advertisements for fame, materialism, sex, carnality, capitalism, money and power. Take the internet and Hollywood as a few examples. All of these qualities are not Jedi qualities. Jedis are monks. Monks don't follow these things. Actually, the Sith do. Hence USA is predominantly Sith instead of Jedi. Funnies aside, I give this TV show 2.5. It's amusing if you don't take it seriously and ignore the convoluted mixed actions of protagonists and antagonist. I think they wanted to have the audience question themselves: Who is good? Who is bad? Who is the protagonist? Who is the villain? Because quite frankly they should've taken an alternate approach instead - Who is an incompetent emotional idiot? (Sol) Who is too competent but tyrannical? (The Sith dude). I won't be surprised if they add some amount of attraction-flirtation between the Sith dude and Osha in the future. It would not surprise me.

The show basically excretes on all famous personalities from caesar to magnus to cleopatra etc, it also doesn't spare the excrement on vorenus who seems to be the only white spot on the blackboard. Interestingly, titus pullo who is a brute is not excreted upon and instead his bastard son ends up the prince of Egypt. Clear bias in terms of excrement. It's entertaining enough if not taken seriously and this show should never be taken as factual. I give this 3 out of 5. Not for underaged audience.

It's like freeing a dog from their collar and it ends up speaking about the collar as if it were a halo. Some dogs will always wag for a collar.