Amanda Crow

Reviews and other content aren't verified by Google

I want to like this show but SERIOUSLY 😳 It's OBVIOUS that they are either BIAS or NOT paying ATTENTION on a LOT of cases! - Case: 287, season 3 Episode 6 Clearly the materials were damaged (rusted photos), the end RESULT was NOT desirable, or FUNCTIONAL??? He ADMITTED (at the end of the episode) that it 😱FELL DOWN at least once🤕 How did they rule against this little old granny's refund???? -Case 341 Season 3 episode 7 Judge Tonya Akers was too busy tooting her pro recreational drugs horn to let the court HEAR 🙉 the plaintiffs claim for emotional distress Clearly BIAS in how she BELITTLES the plaintiffs PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!?!?!🤯 YES!!✅ IT SHOULD BE SCARY and DESTRESSING for a little old lady to find out that her tenets are participating in the RECLESS RECREATIONAL DRUG COMMUNITY!😱😱🤕 Especially at the EXPENSE of her PROPERTY! The DAMAGE CLEARLY was NORMAL WEAR and tare😦😨😰 I could go on. . . WHY so AGGRESSIVELY BIAS😟😥 sometimes? Disappointment 😥