I want to like this show but SERIOUSLY ๐ณ It's OBVIOUS that they are either BIAS or NOT paying ATTENTION on a LOT of cases!
- Case: 287, season 3 Episode 6
Clearly the materials were damaged
(rusted photos), the end RESULT was
NOT desirable, or FUNCTIONAL???
He ADMITTED (at the end of the
episode) that it ๐ฑFELL DOWN at
least once๐ค How did they rule
against
this little old granny's refund????
-Case 341 Season 3 episode 7
Judge Tonya Akers was too busy
tooting her pro recreational drugs
horn to let the court HEAR ๐ the
plaintiffs claim for emotional
distress Clearly BIAS in how
she BELITTLES the plaintiffs
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!?!?!๐คฏ
YES!!โ
IT SHOULD BE SCARY and
DESTRESSING for a little old lady to
find out that her tenets are
participating in the RECLESS
RECREATIONAL DRUG
COMMUNITY!๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ค Especially at
the EXPENSE of her PROPERTY! The
DAMAGE CLEARLY was NORMAL
WEAR and tare๐ฆ๐จ๐ฐ
I could go on. . . WHY so AGGRESSIVELY BIAS๐๐ฅ sometimes? Disappointment ๐ฅ