Overall she questions her feminism, which is healthy, but the MRA movement isn't really held to the same standard of scrutiny that she holds feminism to. An unbiased review could absolutely deduce that patriarchy is responsible for both view points and grievances, obviously experienced very differently by each gender, but patriarchy is never addressed from a neutral standpoint. It's a little too empathetic to the men's standpoint without opening up the broader picture of what women experience statistically and obviously in disproportion to men. If you're going to offer stats, can we place do it for both genders? That was only done accurately for DV. She also mentioned sex trafficking and other issues that are primarily experienced by women, but where were the comparative stats then? I went into it open and left pretty dissatisfied. The women's movement has a much richer history than just complaining, and I didn't feel that was obviously represented here. She is intimidately involved, and I've also been temporarily persuaded by charismatic arguments, but overall this wasn't for me.