mark harold

Ok I will give credits for the action scenes such as the fight scenes and explosive effects.. what really disturbed me is the myriad of tactical errors and action plots details.. 1st flash back scene.. 2 soldiers infiltrate an entire holdout full of terrorist while making tons of ruckus and noises knocking a few terrorists at first, not even one or even the ones at the next room decided to sound the alarm.. Ok perhaps I missed something there.. ..and when they got the hostages they had to wake the town up by kicking the last dude off the window? - was that part of the plan to be discovered and start a rumble? Ok that's fine, am not gonna comment about the hilarious and unrealistic battles here after.. Umm...., WAS the high value target scene even relevant or just to Show that this two don't follow orders? when they finally got to the extraction point! the chopper sits in an open area.. Clever right? Why not land where the terrorists were.. while escaping they begged the terrorist not to pull the trigger.. Why would they rig their escape vehicle with explosives instead? - its obviously a trap.. Or terrorists perhaps are that dumb.. like also the car that was several feet under at the vault suddenly came back up to the action when the heroes was chasing the bad guys at the top level.. was really trying to make sense of this.. Right after that scene I just survived through the movie and yea I won't say anything further on the errors.. For those who perhaps would just enjoy the movie I think its fine but this silly mistakes that some do observe in detail does spoil everything.. And yea the dialogues, can be improved.. The Antagonist however did spring the movie back a little, I would have ended half-way if it was not for the scene he reveals himself.. managed to finish the movie.. no one expects perfection, but the action plot can use some serious improvement.. no offense but that is just my point of view, of cause for the effort I still throw a 3 star and a honest review..