This film is a biopic of the life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, a nuclear physicist, during the period of time he spearheaded the development of the atomic bomb. It deals with not only the project and its impact on the lives of Robert and others, but also with the time period after, when the government trials him.
I have to give credit to Nolan. I was seriously expecting to be antsy and feel this run time (given the minimal to no action), but I was compelled for the three hour runtime. The script is written in masterful fashion, jumping between time periods, leaving key clues and context unanswered until later, and giving a real weight and importance to every conversation. The manner in which the story unfolds is unconventional and polished - Nolan's ability to tell a riveting and intelligent story stays unrivalled. Apart from the script, I loved the little stylistic touches that embellish the entire film. During close ups of Oppenheimer, we often see intentional focus racking/ breathing, really showing us his unstable and conflicted mental state, like he is ready to collapse due to the pressure. Apart from this almost every scene where a face is involved, there is a subtle zoom happening, drawing me in, making it feel interesting. The sound design is superb, with its jarringly loud explosions, beautiful score and a plethora of subjective, expressive sounds which really add to scenes. Every single scene Oppenheimer is in, there is light contrast on his face, one side brighter, one darker. The lighting is never flattering, making him appear troubled, weathered and rugged.
I really wish I did some mild research beforehand. I am extremely ignorant on this man and even this section of history, so I found some sections a bit confusing. I was trying to take in the general scene composition, but also piece together what is happening and why. I'm specifically talking about the last section of the movie where the court and interrogations take centre stage. My mind was constantly running in the background because I didn't understand why Oppenheimer was being tried, and by who exactly. If I had a bit of context beforehand, I would have appreciated this section so much more.
That isn't really a complaint, as I could have easily missed a piece of dialogue or detail, so here are my complaints. The film felt a little convoluted. It throws enough minor characters at you to fill a warehouse, and I was constantly taken out of the movie trying to remind myself who a character is, what their importance is, and where we'd last seen them. The final 30 mins or so, where we constantly jump from Downys black and white scenes to Oppenheimers interrogation room - it lost me. The issue is with a film this dense, where every single line and detail matters, is becoming confused snowballs extremely quickly as events and conversations carry on. Or maybe its just me… I felt like the Los Alamos section of the film was the pinnacle, with tightly paced scenes and conversations, high intensity and intrigue, and an explosion that was technically and stylistically executed to what I’d consider perfection. The last hour of the movie I felt dragged, and it sort of felt like a slow death of my interest until the credits rolled.
Overall, Oppenheimer is a layered character piece, where Nolan weaves an intelligent story of inward and outer destruction, burden and government deceit. Its visuals and sound compliment the script exceptionally, but some sections feel like they drag behind others.