So, now that I’ve watched the first episode.
It is profoundly meh. It’s not bad, but it’s not great either.
Firstly, I thought we were promised a project faithful to the source material? From Percy’s first encounter with Ms. Dodds, to getting Riptide, to the entire character of Sally Jackson. It seems like some kind of weird fanfiction. The first episode takes tremendous liberties with scenes from the book, and then adds unnecessary moments. Like Grover turning on Percy and getting him expelled. Or Sally Jackson’s lady in the rain scene. They just seem out of place. They also totally changed Gabe’s character, he’s an abusive monster in the books, but in this, he just comes off as goofy. So again, I have to ask, where exactly is the extreme faithfulness to the source material?
Now, there are some good parts, I enjoyed Percy’s actors performance a lot more than I thought I would. I would like a little more of the sass that he had in The Adam Project, which lovers of the Percy Jackson books are all too familiar with. I enjoy Mr. Brunners (Chirons) sage-esque demeanor. I’m glad the Minotaur was in his underwear.
From what I have seen so far, I was correct to manage my expectations. There is still potential. But with the liberties I’ve already seen taken with both events and characters, I do not think this series is or will be the masterpiece that the five star ratings say it is. I think they are blinded by nostalgia and ideology.