Sean Vincent

This book was a wasted opportunity. While Ken Kratz had a platform and medium to tell a more complete story of the Steven Avery case from the prosecution point-of-view (as we have seen the lawyers on both sides of the Casey Anthony case do), he choose instead to write a book that is disjointed and reads more like a blog of a jilted lover than of the prosecutor of one of the most publicized cases in recent history. The book is disjointed and full of repetition - almost as if the author thought if he told the reader the same thing enough times, the reader would finally believe him. Most of the book was spent scolding the directors and viewers of Making a Murderer for forgetting about the victim in this case. Unfortunately, he spent so much time mentioning how the defense, viewers, and documentary ignored the victim of this case, he ignored her himself, despite having one or two very, very short passages about who she was. It read more like a defense of Ken Kratz or a rebuttal to a reddit post and less like a book on the Steven Avery case where opinion is key and fact is sometimes thrown in. It truly was a wasted opportunity and it is a book that left me disappointed. I don't say this often about books, but this was a book that was just poorly thought out and executed.{Basically Ken Kratz is a opportunist who is to this day riding the Steve Avery and Brendan Dasey gavy train because he is a pathetic excuse of a man} Steve Avery and Brendan not guilty 💯