Blatantly lies about Dworkin biography (no, she wasn't just some prostitude with a hubby; she was a radical leftist with a husband who she thought was egalitarian towards her, but ended up being battered by him and later when she ran away from him was forced to prostitute herself alongside earning money by writing, because the latter alone was not enough) and also lies about Dworkin and Mackinnon accepting conservative's proposal to collaborate with them. THEY HAVE REFUSED. I repeat THEY HAVE REFUSED. It is a very important point in feminist history, how the fuck the dumbass author manages to pretend that the opposite has happened is infuriating to me. Also, no, nothing Dworkin has said is "extremist", unless one means it in a way of "going to the end of one's thoughts". All the supposedly outrageous excerpts from her work are in fact are very sensible. Perhaps the author must at least try to be honest with herself for a moment and instead of going into immediate moral outrage the moment the instilled value of intercourse (which IS harmful to females inherently - ask any evolutionary biologist about anisogamy and unequal costs of reproduction) is getting critiqued, try to understand and think about such an idea. After all, it is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it.