Chris A Figaro

Joe killed himself, just as the villains had planned to do throughout this absurd film. But it was a pointless suicide because it was based on a speculation or a possibility. This is just another one of Ruin Johnsons films where he subverts expectations.

This movie gave us nothing. Just like part 2.

The movie SUCKS!!!! At the start of the film, Kate's boyfriend should have died first. Then, instead of killing the others, have them get injured. Have the team part ways, then skip five years. This way, when Kate's friend comes back with a job for her, she will understand the importance and severity of the situation. We get to see her and the team's characters transform. But we don't get any of that because they all died. Instead, we get this annoying character, Tyler, and his crew. Tyler is a terrible character. One moment he's a careless egomaniac, and then suddenly he cares about people dying and wants to help. This is not how this works. For example, out of nowhere, we cut to a small town that was ravished by a tornado. We are supposed to care about this after watching a bunch of reckless guys chase a tornado, playing games, and having fun. They don't care, so why should we? Then we cut to the stadium, where a tornado randomly comes, just like in the original. And a bunch of people died again. Why did Tyler's character change all of a sudden? He's apparently a caring guy. Newsflash: Tyler is NOT a good guy. Stop forcing it. Also, the music is not good. Overall, 5/10.

The characters lacked interest and the jokes weren't funny. But I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy some parts of it. Especially the ambush scene where they had to silently kill everyone. I had a chuckle there. Overall, 7/10.

"I'm sorry that you had to endure that tonight," Robert tells his new wife, and I'm here asking myself why. What was the hardship that she endured, a wedding party? I detest how the film presents Elizabeth and other women as strong-willed and outspoken, as it is primarily a modernist interpretation. It lessens the authenticity of the characters and takes away from the historical setting. Elizabeth should get up, leave, and give her husband the space when he says he needs it to talk to his brothers. This bold act of defiance is so feminist and present-day. And why did he apologise to her? Why did he say that he was rude, then they kissed, and then she left? What was the point of that? On another note, Robert is portrayed as a boring character. His military failures, stemming from his foolish actions caused most of his men to die. Also, Robert and his men seem to have no fear for God. Are they not Catholics? Because they murder men while they are praying and inside churches. These actions make it very difficult to route for Robert and his cause. Especially when this entire rebellion is unwarranted. The film started with the Scots making a treaty with the King of England because they had fought and lost. William Wallace's capture and death is not a valid reason for rebellion. One could argue that the film's visually impressive battle sequences are one of its strong points. But that can't redeem the film's flawed narrative and morally ambiguous protagonist. After the battle, Robert reunited with his wife, and everything is dandy as though she wasn't just a prisoner for however long. Where is the "I'm sorry that you had to endure that" sympathy for what she endured now as opposed to the wedding party? In the end, the Prince was right. Robert is a godless murderer who should be excommunicated. Overall, 6/10.

The movie is well-made for the era, featuring tense action sequences, witty dialogue, and realistic settings. Rocky in particular exhibits glimmers of humanity and remorse beneath his hard exterior, making him one of the most well-developed and complex characters. In addition, the movie raises ethical concerns about how the government, the media, and the church shape public opinion and social behaviour. But there are some problems with the movie as well. The priest's plot against the corrupt politicians and gangsters seems contrived and unrealistic. His final visit to Rocky in prison is disappointing, as he does not offer him any spiritual comfort or guidance, but only asks him to pretend to be a coward in front of the kids. He also assaults a reporter in an earlier scene, which undermines his credibility as a moral authority. The film's ending is ambiguous and controversial, leaving the audience to wonder if Rocky's last act was sincere or staged. Another weakness of the film is the portrayal of the kids, who are supposed to be Rocky's admirers and Father Connolly's proteges. They seem like real brats who are rude, rebellious, and disrespectful to everyone. They do not show any gratitude or remorse for their actions, and they do not seem to learn anything from their experiences. They are not worth saving anyway, as they are likely to follow Rocky's footsteps or end up in jail or worse. They are not sympathetic or relatable characters, but rather annoying and irritating ones. Overall, Angels with Dirty Faces is a compelling and entertaining film that deserves its place in cinematic history. It offers a fascinating portrait of a flawed hero who struggles with his conscience and his fate. It also challenges the viewers to reflect on their own values and beliefs.

This show was really bad. Besides episodes 1 and 2, everything else was just a drag. The finale was so rushed, as I expected. Because, again, (minus episodes 1 and 2) when you have 6 episodes and you waste those episodes for your own agendas and on unnecessary dragged-out storylines where basically NOTHING HAPPENS, you get a rushed finale.

It's a well-made film. Divided into two plots, they both go hand in hand smoothly. There is one scene that I didn't quite understand though. When Mrs Pretty asks Mr Brown to accompany her to dinner, and Mr Brown said yes, what happened after? Did they go? Did Mr Brown call it off? I was confused. The soundtrack was excellent. It gave the film a calm and emotional theme. I like these kinds of films.

The faults were the dialogue being slow and lame, the show itself being too slow, lack of plot in the present scenes, 2 episodes having nothing to do with the show, lack of originality etc. Halo ring, why? Terminator reference, why? King Kong reference, why? Why is a bounty hunter replacing his 'bounty friendly' ship for a naboo starfighter? Cad bane's death was disappointing. The past scenes were good though. The soundtrack was also good. Especially the credits. Overall, the main issue was the writing, writing for dialogue, and imagination. Especially imagination. Imagination is very crucial for Star Wars. I miss Goerge Lucas.

This film was cliched, generic, and had little stakes. It was also rushed heavily. It didn't give itself time to grow. Like from the childhood scenes up to the time they became adults. Milo's sudden change in behaviour came out of nowhere. If the film paced itself smoothly and didn't rush itself, maybe that transition in character would make more sense - along with a whole lot of other stuff. All in all, it's a watchable film, not a bad film. That's all I have to say.